Comments on: Britannica Online Kicks Wikipedia’s Butt :: It Isn’t Even Close http://www.auburnmedia.com/wordpress/2008/05/06/britannica-online-kicks-wikipedias-butt-it-isnt-even-close/ Public Relations :: Marcom Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:09:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Robert http://www.auburnmedia.com/wordpress/2008/05/06/britannica-online-kicks-wikipedias-butt-it-isnt-even-close/#comment-6827 Robert Thu, 08 May 2008 03:28:51 +0000 http://www.auburnmedia.com/wordpress/2008/05/06/britannica-online-kicks-wikipedias-butt-it-isnt-even-close/#comment-6827 Agreed, Mike. The Citizendium model seems to be more workable. It, too, has some problems, but I will trust it long before I trust Wikipedia. Thanks for the links. They provide some good arguments regarding Wikipedia's inherent problems. Agreed, Mike. The Citizendium model seems to be more workable. It, too, has some problems, but I will trust it long before I trust Wikipedia. Thanks for the links. They provide some good arguments regarding Wikipedia’s inherent problems.

]]> By: Wikipedia Review http://www.auburnmedia.com/wordpress/2008/05/06/britannica-online-kicks-wikipedias-butt-it-isnt-even-close/#comment-6822 Wikipedia Review Wed, 07 May 2008 06:19:51 +0000 http://www.auburnmedia.com/wordpress/2008/05/06/britannica-online-kicks-wikipedias-butt-it-isnt-even-close/#comment-6822 Good post and your analysis is correct. Wikipedia is now riddled with problems that stem from its irresponsible, contradictory and unworkable core structure. The place to go for more Wikipedia Criticism, which is something of a cottage industry these days, is The Wikipedia Review. The problems caused by are simply to numerous to detail, but this piece captures some of the essence. <a target="_blank" href="http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20080104/criticisms-of-wikipedia/" rel="nofollow">http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20080104/criticisms-of-wikipedia/</a> <em>(infOpinions? edit - Visit this site which Mike, the person leaving this comment, also provided in a second comment: <a target="_blank" href="http://blog.wikipediareview.com/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.wikipediareview.com/</a>)</em> Good post and your analysis is correct. Wikipedia is now riddled with problems that stem from its irresponsible, contradictory and unworkable core structure.

The place to go for more Wikipedia Criticism, which is something of a cottage industry these days, is The Wikipedia Review. The problems caused by are simply to numerous to detail, but this piece captures some of the essence.

http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20080104/criticisms-of-wikipedia/

(infOpinions? edit - Visit this site which Mike, the person leaving this comment, also provided in a second comment: http://blog.wikipediareview.com/)

]]> By: Robert http://www.auburnmedia.com/wordpress/2008/05/06/britannica-online-kicks-wikipedias-butt-it-isnt-even-close/#comment-6816 Robert Tue, 06 May 2008 21:57:09 +0000 http://www.auburnmedia.com/wordpress/2008/05/06/britannica-online-kicks-wikipedias-butt-it-isnt-even-close/#comment-6816 You're welcome, Tom. My pleasure. I have fond memories of Britannica and I'm enjoying the online version. So, thank you, too. You’re welcome, Tom. My pleasure. I have fond memories of Britannica and I’m enjoying the online version. So, thank you, too.

]]> By: Tom Panelas http://www.auburnmedia.com/wordpress/2008/05/06/britannica-online-kicks-wikipedias-butt-it-isnt-even-close/#comment-6812 Tom Panelas Tue, 06 May 2008 18:35:25 +0000 http://www.auburnmedia.com/wordpress/2008/05/06/britannica-online-kicks-wikipedias-butt-it-isnt-even-close/#comment-6812 Hey, thanks for your kind words. Tom P. at Britannica Hey, thanks for your kind words. Tom P. at Britannica

]]>